The peer review system is breaking down. Here’s how we can fix it

Finding qualified peer reviewers has become one of the most significant challenges editors face. When peer review cannot be ...
News Medical

Study suggests most clinical studies posted to medRxiv and later published in peer-reviewed journals had concordant study characteristics, results, and interpretations

In a recent study published in JAMA Network Open, researchers compared and determined the concordance between the study design, results, and inferences of clinical and observational studies and ...
The American Journal of Managed Care

How Medical Journals Are Grappling With AI in Peer Review

A new study revealed divergent policies on artificial intelligence (AI) use in peer review among leading medical journals, with confidentiality concerns driving prohibitions. The rise of artificial ...
Hosted on MSN

10 million peer reviews expected in 2025: Experts advocate for AI integration

It is expected that in 2025, approximately three million articles will be indexed in Scopus and the Web of Science. If each undergoes peer review by two experts, and an additional 2 million articles ...
The Conversation

What is peer review? The role anonymous experts play in scrutinizing research before it gets published

Joshua Winowiecki does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond ...
Wall Street Journal

What’s Wrong With Peer Review?

The latest in a series of high-profile retractions of research papers has people asking: What’s wrong with peer review? Scientific and medical journals use the peer-review process to decide which ...