Divided 6th Circuit panel created two splits with other appeals courts, which invites SCOTUS review, on how to treat ...
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett is lying when she says that emergency decisions by the court without a full hearing are justified.
The New Republic on MSNOpinion

Has the Supreme Court Abandoned Originalism?

The right-wing majority has veered hard in the direction of the unitary executive theory—and a schism with conservative legal ...
The US Supreme Court, hearing arguments Wednesday over a core provision of the Voting Rights Act, appeared inclined to limit ...
The Supreme Court's 2025-26 term is set to address divisive cases on race, gender, and presidential authority, shaping the ...
The push by advocates comes as the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to decide whether to hear a case that could change the fate ...
As the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Chiles v. Salazar last week—a case that could overturn bans on ...
A former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas has warned that the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution “appears ...
On Oct. 15, 1991, the United States Senate voted to confirm Clarence Thomas to the United States Supreme Court.
Former Clarence Thomas clerk Caleb Nelson challenged the legal basis for expanding presidential power to fire federal ...
Legal Newsletter highlights the battle over voting rights, the death penalty, Alex Jones’ rejection, a possible Trump cameo ...
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is the primary way plaintiffs can challenge racially discriminatory election practices.