Two years ago, the US Supreme Court surprised observers and even some inside the court when it narrowly preserved the 1965 ...
It is key to the longtime objectives supported by and benefiting the billionaires who funded the court-capture machine.
Roberts himself has been in the majority for nearly all of his Court’s worst decisions, and it is therefore no exaggeration ...
Opinion
The New Republic on MSNHas the Supreme Court Abandoned Originalism?
The right-wing majority has veered hard in the direction of the unitary executive theory—and a schism with conservative legal ...
The Supreme Court’s 2025 term could carry major rulings on voting rights, campaign finance, executive power and transgender rights.
The yearning for a king's paternal guidance suffuses the conservative justices' push to affirm the "unitary executive" theory ...
3don MSN
Takeaways from the Supreme Court arguments on the Voting Rights Act and race-based redistricting
The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority appeared open to weakening the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965 in a way ...
A Republican attack on a core provision of the Voting Rights Act that's designed to protect racial minorities comes to the ...
For twenty years, the chief justice and his wrecking crew have toppled precedents—no wonder the Roberts Court is hemorrhaging public support.
WASHINGTON, Oct 15 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court 's conservative justices signaled their willingness on Wednesday to ...
The US Supreme Court, hearing arguments Wednesday over a core provision of the Voting Rights Act, appeared inclined to limit ...
10don MSNOpinion
How the Supreme Court could aid the GOP's redistricting games
If the court rules quickly enough in a key voting rights case, it could allow yet another round of partisan redistricting ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results