KIRPAL SINGH Vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI & ORS. Dated: November 21,2024. Secretary, Irrigation Dept. 2008 (7) SCC 169. (supra).

i) The learned Special Judge vide order dated 13th June, 2018 dismissed the application on the ground of tenability and jurisdiction to decide the said application to deal with civil liability as ...

(ii) In view of the fact that the entry No. 64 was passed on the basis of oral sale, whether the Courts below have erred in holding that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to decide the legality or ...

i. The NHAI shall deposit 50 per cent of the compensation amount, as awarded by the Arbitral Court, with the Executing Court within a period of four weeks. The said amount shall be released to the ...

Learned counsel for appellants would submit that, whatever allegations are made about demand, is not illegal demand towards any dowry. According to him, demand was towards customary rituals which are ...

The Karnataka High Court upheld a trial court order discharging a public servant of graft charges under the Prevention of ...

In a recent decision in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Permission as sought for is granted. List the matter before this Bench on 08.01.2024 ...

The Act is a piece of Civil Code which is applicable to every woman in India irrespective of her religious affiliation and/or social background for a more effective protection of her rights guaranteed ...

Section 376D and Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code. The Nachna, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. District and Sessions Judge, Pokaran (Jaisalmer). 7. The prosecution has examined one witness so far.

33. Under the circumstances, and for the reasons supra, the arrest of the petitioners is held to be illegal for breach of mandatory provision under Section 41A Cr.P.C. CORAM : ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, & N.

This matter was called on for hearing today. Mr. Abhikalp Pratap Singh. 8. With the above order, I.A. No.208763/2024 stands disposed of.